Back to blog

Motrin Moms Take it to the Street

If Twitter is social media's living room, then the conversation and uproar over the new Motrin ad is now spilling out into the streets -- moms upset by the ad have created YouTube video responses, Flickr groups, a CafePress Shop, and many, many, many, many blog posts in response to the ad.

Last night I wondered how long the ad would remain on the website. This morning I wonder how common it is for brands to actively listen to social media over the weekends, nevermind have the systems in place to respond quickly during off-hours.

Most of the uproar seems to be at the condescending tone and content of the ad, mainly the idea that:

  1. Moms wear babies in slings as a fashion statement, or to be trendy
  2. Wearing babies in slings is a new thing
  3. Moms are crazy

Although the ad doesn't come right out and say it, I think another underlying message is that moms secretly resent having to carry kids. The implication that caring for her kids causes a mom so much pain that she needs a pill to solve it makes mothering itself seem like a disease that requires treating.

Some twitterers are looking thoughtfully at the ad itself, wondering if it had to be this way:

twitter-_-tomcummings_-devil_s-advocate_-is-motr

Could the ad have been designed in such a way as to still target new mothers, but without the condescending tone and widely perceived insults? It's certainly true that new mothers, and mothers in general, are a valuable target market for a brand like Motrin. What could they have done differently?

(Ed: here's a suggested rewrite of the ad, suggested on the #MotrinMom thread.)

TJ Sondermann (@sondernagle), creator of the flickr group already mentioned, sent me this tweet late last night:

twitter-_-tj-sondermann_-bethdunn-if-the-ad-comes

What do you think?

(ed: Here's an interesting take on the mixed message of the ad, given the potential risks of using ibuprofin during nursing, by a former pharma rep for Motrin.)